🔗 Share this article

The Four Spent the Day Together centers on individuals chasing after new beginnings, struggling to escape drugs or harmful partnerships, only to find hope curdling into conflict. Kraus repeatedly invokes the phrase "new beginning", making it deliberately jaded through recurring use. Sentences like "He could make a fresh start" and "They chose to begin anew" are scattered across the story. And yet, Kraus herself seems to be making her individual reinvention, since this appears a new kind of book – fact-based, genuinely novelistic. However it reveals itself to be packed with the same dilemmas and approaches as earlier books.

From Accidental Writer to Cult Classic

Kraus was originally an artist who became a writer somewhat by chance with her 1997 cult classic I Love Dick, made up of letters to an unreceptive lover, elevating personal female narrative from self-debasement into assassination. She continued writing, but the next trio of engaging and challenging novels did not possess the shock and immediacy that the correspondence format brought to the voice of I Love Dick. Compounding this was her role as a maverick maker who had evolved into a large-scale low-rent landlord, so there was significant attention on property transactions. It is logical that she presently aims to explore fresh narrative sources, directing her gaze to the experiences of others, at a moment when she states that contemporary political climate makes confessional writing unnecessary.

Three Generations, Collective Unavoidable Background

The Four Spent the Day Together is divided into three sections, spanning three generations – all unable to escape their backgrounds. There is the narrative about characters Emma and Jasper, representations of her own mother and father, relocating from the Bronx to a pastoral setting. Then there is the story of Kraus herself, in the character of a figure named Catt Greene, confronting the late recognition of I Love Dick, the rise of Trump, and her substance-dependent spouse a man named Paul. Finally the account of a killing of one troubled youth by another in a locality long abandoned by liberal ideals only 80 miles from the protagonist's home in the Minnesota countryside.

From my perspective as a reader drawn to refined literature of the type Kraus typically rejects, I was captivated by the literary tone of the opening part.

As a reader drawn to precise prose of the kind that Kraus herself often disregards, I was captivated by the storytelling approach of the initial part. It possesses a new quality of attentiveness that accommodates trivial aspects, like the pail that the young Catt frees from the ice at the start of the story, assisted by her cherished parent. "I discovered a frozen plaything!" she exclaims; "a great plaything", he responds, "the nuanced interpretations of terms circulating in their speech like piece candy". Kraus writes Emma's narrative with curiosity and intimacy. "Emma experienced a dreamlike sensation – not hers, exactly."

Letdown and Fragmentation

I was destined to be disappointed when I expected this different style could continue through the novel. The author states here that she dislikes the satisfaction readers like me have derived from I Love Dick; she's dedicated to fragmentation, to the untidy aesthetics she echoes from her inspiration writer Kathy Acker, and the emptiness and redundancy of her past books comes back in the central part. Catt is trying to renovate multiple decrepit residences in Albuquerque's worst neighbourhoods while traveling between Minnesota and LA, unable to aid Paul control his drinking. She feels helpless as her spouse cycles through underfunded jobs as an substance abuse counselor in a society driven by the hostility and dread that underpins Trump's victory. A significant portion discusses about Catt being cancelled on Twitter, her occupation changed from "novelist" to "property owner" on Wikipedia. She still gives the impression to be overly concerned about this. On one occasion she states that she's investigating the murder so that before departing the state, "she may grasp something about an the United States that her online critics would be unable to grasp, would not even see".

The Murder Narrative

Thus we arrive to the homicide in question – and the eponymous day passed by the murdered individual with the murderer and his companions. Kraus utilizes great source material, and knows hour by hour what occurred as Brandon came to see Brittney after encountering her on a platform where she sold sex pictures. He sought a sexual encounter but appears congenially to have passed the day alongside her friends, wandering about having his vehicle repaired and funding treats and narcotics, before being shot by her romantic interest Micah – a youth with psychological issues who has often been institutionalized for aggressive outbursts.

Fascination and Incompletion

The protagonist becomes fixated by the narrative, and I was intrigued by the way that Kraus's dual urges towards responsible documentation and reckless transgression tussle in this section. But I'd have liked her to go further into her own obsessions here. The compelling persona is Brittney herself, who gains dimension in part due to the protagonist's connection to her – yet another intelligent, harassed young woman going off the rails in a troubled, forgotten town. Kraus notes that the protagonist communicates with Brittney in prison, but she fails to enact these dialogues. The complete segment feels curiously unresolved, to the extent that the author's storytelling ends almost mid-par