🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that indecision over how to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.